Six underwriting & issuance systems, one pipeline — federated bind-rate, pricing and velocity, and the margin lost to standalone off-core systems.
Bringing the 2 standalone off-core systems onto the BaNCS core recovers ~₹238 Cr on premium Generali Central already quotes — ₹16 Cr of discount leakage plus ₹222 Cr of bind-rate uplift. The standalone systems bind less and discount more, with no central pricing governance.
4 of 4 headline metrics improving vs prior · still off target: Gross Written Premium (GWP) ₹5,548 Cr vs ₹6,100 Cr, Gross Direct Premium (GDPI) ₹5,408 Cr vs ₹5,900 Cr, Digital Policy Issuance 87.0% vs 92.0%
Standalone systems discount at 8% vs the BaNCS core 5% — recovering ₹16 Cr of margin on the policies they already bind, no new selling required.
Bringing standalone bind-rate from 39% to the BaNCS-core 56% on ₹1,290 Cr of quotes adds ₹222 Cr of premium.
One pricing engine and STP workflow recovers ~₹238 Cr combined and flips these lines from estimates to policy-grain actuals.
Each line still quotes in its own system — the TCS BaNCS core for retail health & motor, the IRIS agent platform, the broker portal (EASE) and web / WhatsApp & aggregator issuance, plus the standalone bancassurance CBS bridge and commercial underwriting. Federated, they total ₹6,940 Cr of open quotes; but the standalone off-core systems bind less and discount more, with no central pricing governance. One view shows where the margin leaks.
BaNCS-core systems (governed pricing) vs standalone off-core ones — note how bind-rate falls and discount/cycle rise off-core.
| Issuance system | Line | Quotes | Value | Bind-rate | Discount | Cycle | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCS BaNCS core (retail health + motor) | Health & Personal Accident | 1800 | ₹2,400 Cr | 62% | 4% | 1d | Integrated |
| IRIS agent self-issuance platform | Motor (OD + TP) | 1200 | ₹1,550 Cr | 58% | 5% | 1d | Integrated |
| Broker portal / EASE | Commercial & Property | 420 | ₹1,000 Cr | 40% | 8% | 6d | Integrated |
| Commercial underwriting (manual + BaNCS) | Commercial & Property | 300 | ₹900 Cr | 35% | 9% | 10d | Standalone |
| Web / WhatsApp & aggregator issuance | Health & Personal Accident | 900 | ₹700 Cr | 55% | 3% | 1d | Integrated |
| Bancassurance CBS bridge (Central Bank) | Motor (OD + TP) | 260 | ₹390 Cr | 48% | 6% | 3d | Standalone |
Bringing the standalone systems to the BaNCS-core discipline is worth real money on premium Generali Central is already quoting.
If standalone tools discounted at the integrated 5% instead of 8%, on the deals they already win.
Lifting standalone bind-rate from 39% to the BaNCS-core 56% on ₹1,290 Cr of quotes.
Standalone quote→issue cycles run far longer; one STP engine shortens time-to-issue and frees underwriting capacity.
The move: migrate the bancassurance CBS bridge and commercial underwriting onto the BaNCS core with one pricing engine and STP workflow. It recovers ~₹238 Cr combined, and — like the customer master — it's the same standardization that flips these lines from estimates to policy-grain actuals everywhere else in the cockpit.